Kommentare zu: Upcoming improvements of the Mercurial Bookmarks extension

Von: Bastian

Bastian — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:05:21 +0000

So I wonder, who’ll tackle the wire protocol – it would open up a lot of possibilities for extensions if metadata could be synched.

Von: dsp

dsp — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:56:49 +0000

well we actually decided that we want to use some more generic option do allow pushing/pulling heads, so the non-bookmarked option was backed out.
What we kept was the including of bookmark names in log, and the track.current option, so those will be in 1.2.

Von: Bastian Doetsch

Bastian Doetsch — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 08:54:03 +0000

Too bad – I really would have appreciated it, as this is a major point hindering adoption. So what kind of solution did you guys decide on? And will you implement it or will somebody else do so?

Von: dsp

dsp — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:25:24 +0000

I’m so sorry that those changesets had to be backed-out because of some discussion in IRC . We came to the conclusion that this is no the right way to fix those things :/